My solution? Kill them all. Take them all in, regardless of their gender, age, race, or creed, and just dispose of them.
Problem motherfucking solved.
If they're going to shoot at kids, not care about the lives of others, well then, they should be given a taste of their own medicine.
get working dude
Kill people with cancer.
Yeah, that makes just as much sense as this stupid stamp.
It's not about gangs but it's somehow related to the problem anyway.
(Not sure whether it is (all in all) an argument pro or contra my standpoint. I'm just sure that awareness is important!)
Edit: Also not so sure where exactly my standpoint is anymore. I do think that simply killing them all is not going to work because getting them is the major problem. I also think that death penalty, while appearing to be just so justified on most cases, it creates the problem of killing someone who got tricked and I do not want to accept such "collateral damage" within a justice system whatsoever. Instead, "life long" should be indeed life long and not "30 years minus bonus-because-not-being-an-ass-in-prison". So yeah... Edit 2: And have them work for their food!
Gang members are not humans.
Just kill them like animals, huh?
And what's a gang, exactly? How do you want to define that?
You should probably figure that out before you start shooting, don't you think?
I mean, I know you'll "know it when you see it" And that's the important part, right? Brown people with bandannas, some of which own guns or do drugs and, I don't know, they just *look* like gang members, right?
If you're going to advocate blindly murdering people who are in any "gang," you should probably be clear about what that means.
To most white people, a group of other this people on a street corner isn't a gang. But if they're black or brown, they start to look an awful lots like a gang to right-wing whites.
- 1.an organized group of criminals.
- a group of young people involved in petty crime or violence.
- 2gang noun
: a group of criminals
: a group of young people who do illegal things together and who often fight against other gangs
So those are the people the original poster wants to murder.
Are you down with that?
Stop with demagogy, there's no difference in ashes!
I want this to happen for reasons
If you use it for selfish and greedy attentions such as shooting an innocent bystander or attack a mass group of people, it is considered "evil"
But when you use it for more generous and beneficial reasons such as self-defense or protecting someone or something in a weaker state, it is considered "heroic"
Though many say that the use of violence is evil no matter what, and killing the gangs off would be similar to how the Nazis did.
But comparing the event of the past with this idea for the future there are a couple important pin-points that in my opinion MUST be noticed!
The Nazis killed the many races they targeted solely because they were what Hitler claimed as "inferior races". Race was something that these victims could not decide to happen.
The stamp here suggests the killing of gangs because they have committed horrible acts onto society. These gangs definitely could've decided to not carry out such horrible deeds. Even if it is a gang full of members forced into it, the leader itself still could have decided to not start a routine of terrorism to innocent members of civilization.
Comparing The Nazis actions to this action that may or may not even happen in America or any other country and saying it is "just the same" is quite false. The two topics only have one thing in common, and it is the very interesting word "Violence". Violence in which is used for two VERY different reasons.
The Nazis' use was to kill off the races that they thought were inferior to them, regardless of innocence or guiltiness.
This suggestion's use is to kill off the gangs because they have proven they harm the very balance of our society and by killing them would protect us from any more harm. Because let's face it, if we let the gangs run around, I don't think they'll just "fade away".
Now, saying that killing would not makes us the better force, maybe even the worse! That may just be true. But tell me this. Is this a matter of being the better man, or keeping all the innocent from bloodshed and other tragedies? If we are forbidden to use violence in what is practically WAR, what can we use?
Even I have to say this, life isn't a movie, in said movies, they often have morals saying "love and friendship conquer all!!!"
But sadly, this isn't always the case, in fact it is quite rare even! If you come at a gang preaching such things, chances are they'll just laugh in your face and shoot you down.
I'm sorry, but there is no use sugar-coating it....
We live in a world where our news castors tell us of volunteer works and happy upbringings, we are astonished when news of the darkest and sickest of actions and disasters gets out.
The "Fear" Tactic is affective.
Think anymore of them will come under the constant threat of being killed?
NO they will not.
I wonder how many notes you got about how it's "wrong"
Anyhow I am not that much into killing...why are they in a prison again? --> to 'suffer' for their actions, althrought some prisons nowdays are like a hotel -_- so meh.
The destruction of the Gang members
will cause others to flee! Go into hiding
and hopefully never come back.
No matter what we did, this cruelity will always stay in humanity.
And they have balls, greed can do some nasty things.
Killing them won't change anything.
Gangsers and wron doers will come and go, replacing the old ones.
But, I hav dounts on it, I won't make you think different. At least some can think anything can change, but dicussion alone won't do much.
Anyway at least a try wouldn't hurt?